Season 2: Cycle 8: Alchemix
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Following our recommendation we are happy to support the proposal.
Season 2: Cycle 8: Arrakis
Vote: No
Rationale: Following our recommendation we are will go against the proposal.
Season 2: Cycle 8: Symphony
Vote: No
Rationale: Following our recommendation we are will go against the proposal.
Season 2: Cycle 8: Homora
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Following DeFi Commmitee C’s recommendation, we are happy to support this proposal.
Season 2: Cycle 8: Angle
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Following DeFi Commmitee C’s recommendation, we are happy to support this proposal.
Season 2: Cycle 8: InsureDAO
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Following DeFi Commmitee C’s recommendation, we are happy to support this proposal.
Season 2: Cycle 8: Curve
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Following DeFi Commmitee C’s recommendation, we are happy to support this proposal.
Season 2: Cycle 8: PoolTogether
Vote: No
Rationale: We are voting against the committee recommendation. PT is a great product, but the 110k for alternative interfaces is far too much. It’s a great concept and they will be testing it with a project that’s already being funded.
I rather see the success of that before deploying further capital for it.
Season 2: Cycle 8: Overnight
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Following DeFi Commmitee C’s recommendation, we are happy to support this proposal.
Season 2: Cycle 8: Socket
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Follow the Tooling Committee, we are happy to support this proposal.
Season 2: Cycle 8: EthernautDAO
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Follow the Tooling Committee, we are happy to support this proposal.
Season 2: Cycle 8: Tally Ho
Vote: No
Rationale: Not a fan of the current token distribution method. Size of ask is fine, but the distribution should be amended.
Season 2: Cycle 8: Messari
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Messari have provided a high-quality of service in other protocols with their quarterly and governance reports. We believe they will add a much needed transparency to the OP ecosystem.
Season 2: Cycle 8: DefiLlama
Vote: No
Rationale: Its not exactly clear. “Pay us for our previous work so we can continue building cool things”. DeFi Llama is a great product but they can go for RPGF for their previous work and be more explicit in which work they will complete for a grant from the governance fund.
Season 2: Cycle 8: Agora
Vote: Yes
Rationale: This will help governance in many ways. Governance is an unexplored space with limited tooling, but agora can help push the space forward.
Season 2: Cycle 8: Ambire Wallet
Vote: No
Rationale: Similar to Tally Ho. We already funded a few bridges too.
Season 2: Cycle 8: Mochi
Vote: Yes
Rationale: This is an interesting tool that has the potential to tackle current problems. It’s worth funding experimental products such as Mochi.
Season 2: Cycle 8: Velodrome
Vote: No
Rationale: Our recommendation was abstain, but we will be voting no. For such a large request, we’d feel more comfortable if this was broken up or once we have an accountability committee to follow up with grants of this size.