Hello @sraim and thank you for your proposal. Socket is one of the best bridge aggregators out there and its value to Optimism is clear in terms of encouraging users to migrate and increase adoption.
I see you have incorporated feedback from the last round, and you have answered imortant questions in the previous post about double incentives from bridges and sybil resistance. I would encourage you to highlight them in your comment above so that is it’s cleared that you have taken them into consideration.
For gas rebating, I see that you have taken into consideration gas prices on Ethereum mainnet. Is that where most of your volume come from? How about cross-rollup transfers, how much to they weight in your gas calculation? If there are important, I would courage you to add them in your calculation and share them in your proposal so that reviewers have a sense of what is being incentives and refunded.
On another note, I see that you have been given feedback by a delegate to reduce your amount asked by at least 60%, and that you have agreed to do so in cycle 7.
I would encourage to justify your change of amount asked in your proposal, or to stick to the initial recommendation so that the proposal has a better chance of passing this cycle.
If you feel ready, you can change your title from DRAFT to REVIEW (since you have received two delegates approval that your proposal is ready to be reviewed). Then you will have to post it to proposal in this post.
Being one of the first bridge aggregators, I appreciate that Socket is requesting this grant and the goals of this proposal fits well with the goal of incentivizing usage on Optimism.