Hello and thank you for your proposal! Throughout the application process, this forum thread will be one of the official means of communication. Please be sure to monitor it for updates over the course of the review period.
I’ll provide some feedback on this proposal, and note that all changes will need to be in by Monday to ensure they’re properly reviewed by other proposers.
First question - Just to be 100% clear, Vesper is not on Optimism yet right?
Just a quick one here, this is a very high OP grant request for a protocol with approx ~$20M in TVL, and isn’t live on Optimism right now, so there’s not any Optimism specific data to work with. We could probably compare this to Avalanche / Polygon, which only has approx $600-700K liquidity total, this grant would be almost more than TVL on competing chains. I would recommend scaling it heavily downwards.
Please be aware of the no-sale rule, so these sorts of publication / social media campaigns and other protocol expense items couldn’t be reimbursed / paid for with OP tokens. As this would violate the rule. Please restructure this to make sure you’re following it. I’ve included a quick summary of the no-sale rule below.
I’d recommend improving the milestones by including some unique users / tvl under management / other KPI metrics that could be used to gauge the proposal, and the success in the future. Here’s the milestone assessment explainer to learn more - Milestone Assessment
I believe that predominantly distributing OP as a bonus will only attract mercenary capital that will only stay as long as the rewards. This is especially an issue for yield farming protocols. Is there anything you could do here to improve this to better incentive align users, and vesper, to ensure that people stay on Vesper without the users?
Maybe this is better asked as - Is there a way to achieve the yield that are being temporarily increased (due to OP tokens) without the OP rewards in the future?