This is absolutely not what I am suggesting. Its a free market and a user/protocol can do what ever they want with their fund. But I am not supporting subsiding buying and locking protocol native token with gov fund.
I was referring to this data(Edit 1:- this was initial twit, actual distribution was different, more info in comments below) . Gonna keep both for readers to make an informed decision.
https://twitter.com/VelodromeFi/status/1548651423201730561?s=20&t=PSgj9fek0xVUPYr2W_PwdA
again, I am glad we had this conversation at early stage. But I see we are repeating the same statement again and again, this concern was raised in this thread couple of time, you were kind to enough to provide your side but I dont see any progress on this topic.
So, happy Sunday and good luck with voting.
Edit2 : Supported Balancer & BeethovenX proposal then why not this ? Their proposal is not airdropping OP directly to users wallet for locking BAL or Beets
edit 3- dont want to spam the thread so will edit this comment as needed. I understand that, as a user I dont necessarily need to buy the token, acquiring via farming could be another way to get the token. But my concern remain same, we are subsidizing native project token lock by help of gov fund. I would rather like to see them being used as a part of integration grant.