This provides an excellent overview in understanding the activities of delegates and can help determine future committees and committee members.
I’m intrigued to know how many delegates/voters achieved a 100% voter rate.
This is an extremely high number for only five delegates; even with their high participation, is it fair for only five individuals to have such a high amount of power?
Governance fund & Partner fund
An ideal recommendation that has been mentioned in the grant application v2 forum to bring transparency to token holders.
Accountability committee:
For the three proposed committees, each can be held accountable for the grants they recommend.
We expect committee’s to have a strong insight into each grant they recommend so it makes more sense to have these committees be responsible for tracking and following up rather than having an accountability committee.
Open-Sourced Funds Mapping:
Agree with this. A dashboard would provide transparency for each grant, especially since the current setup isn’t too ideal.
Closing thoughts: Voter Participation
I think it is worth considering using Karma to help build a reputation-based system within optimism. As important as metrics are, we should also care about a voter’s participation within the forums.