# \[DRAFT\] \[GF: Phase 1 Proposal\] Arthouse

**URL:** <https://gov.optimism.io/t/draft-gf-phase-1-proposal-arthouse/2897>\
**Category:** Governance Fund: Phase 1\
**Created:** [July 6, 2022, 2:08pm UTC](https://gov.optimism.io/t/draft-gf-phase-1-proposal-arthouse/2897 "2022-07-06T14:08:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomiwa1a](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ed655f/32.png) [@tomiwa1a](https://gov.optimism.io/u/tomiwa1a)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2022, 5:40pm UTC](https://gov.optimism.io/t/draft-gf-phase-1-proposal-arthouse/2897/3 "2022-07-06T17:40:39Z")

</div>

Good question @fig. I conisdered about both options. I thought keeping it separate might make it easier for the reviewers to judge the merits of both proposals separately

But after reading your comment, I can see how it might be better to combine them.

I’ve updated the description and umerged both proposals into the [Atila proposal](https://gov.optimism.io/t/draft-gf-phase-1-proposal-atila/2896).

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.optimism.io/t/draft-gf-phase-1-proposal-arthouse/2897)._
