This is a conflicted post by a member of a competing dex on Optimism, on whose own active proposal
I made a factual statement and offered no opinion or judgment. The facts I offered are inconvenient for his cause.
In response, he’s maligned our protocol’s intent and commitment to the Optimism Collective with no meaningful statement on this proposal’s merits. I hope readers will consider his post with this in mind.
Some additional context is provided in that other thread, and I don’t wish to drag out any ugliness by commenting further.