Delegate Code of Conduct [OLD]

đź“Ś Policies and Templates
11

Yes this sounds better, thank you for taking the time to clarify.

That said, imo it still brings a centralization vector where none should exist or was even needed.

Who in the foundation will be processing such requests? How do you ensure that requests are genuine? How would you fight spam? I can easily see this being a spam vector.

2 Likes
12

Thanks for the feedback everyone! We hear you on the need to update our thinking on the enforcement mechanism and will suggest related changes shortly.

3 Likes
13

Great to have an explicit & detailed post to reference, as well as a path for accountability.

1 Like
14
15
16

Updated with the following changes, based on delegate feedback:

  • The “Off-boarding” enforcement type has been replaced by a three-month Suspension. More permanent, on-chain off-boarding may be added as an enforcement type in future Seasons.
  • We have removed notification of voters to re-delegate in the event of a Suspension.
  • While the Foundation will process reported violations during Season 3, severe violations must be voted on by the Token House, and the Foundation expects to reduce its role in processing all violations in future Seasons.
4 Likes
17

Out of curiosity, what would this look like from an implementation standpoint? A governor contract that blacklists a voting address?

1 Like
18
19

sitting down and waiting further information

1 Like
20

code of conduct much needed for this ecosystem and growing thanks

1 Like
21

Great to have an explicit & detailed post to reference, as well as a path for accountability.

1 Like
22

Minor update to remove contingency language around the Grants Council and Protocol Delegation Program now that both proposals have passed

3 Likes
23

I’m so glad seeing a project with so much care about the character and behaviors of the member. I have so much people with different personality in the crypto space but with these guidelines and delegate code of conduct in a clear language. I’m sure everyone is set to order

2 Likes
24

Consider sharing this in Discord too. Degens tend to forget there are real people behind these accounts

3 Likes
25

facts!, stay optimistic!

2 Likes
26

Updated to reflect the below:

  • Added: Delegates may not vote for their own candidacy in an election.

  • Clarified: While the code of conduct stipulates that delegates may not vote on their own candidacy in elections, in the case of approval/ranked choice votes, delegates may vote for themselves, so long as they also cast votes for the remaining elected positions.

    Example: I can vote for my own candidacy on the Growth Experiments committee, so long as I also cast 4 additional votes (a total of 5 votes, as there are 5 open positions on the sub-committee.)

  • Added: The delegate code of conduct will not cover all possible scenarios and edge cases. We ask that delegates please act in accordance with the spirit of the code of conduct and refrain from exploiting loopholes that may exist.

4 Likes
27

IF I delegate my OP to another wallet and this wallet vote, can I get snapshot ?

1 Like
28

Got it!
Thank you very mucn.

1 Like
29

Explicitly written in simple and clear English

1 Like
30

thats so clear , thank you for spending time to write it

1 Like