GM and thank you for your valuable feedback.
One thing to be careful of in all retrospectives is claiming casuality. While the votable supply increased over the Season, it doesn’t seem that increase is a direct result of specific initiatives to drive votable supply by the ACC (at least none are mentioned in this retrospective) and so is likely the result of unrelated factors such as airdrops, grant delegations, etc.
We had discussed this feedback and going forward will, structure the KPIs more closely with the measurable work done by the ACC so as to not create a situation of claiming casuality.
would add that I would also like to see the ACC facilitate /establish more cross-house conversations between delegates and Citizens.
With regards to this feedback, in the proposed Season 7 ACC Charter we have introduced additional mandates to the ACC for facilitating cross-house conversations, such as being a part of Citizens House discussions in instances where the Citizens House considers a veto, and also discussed potentially hosting a cross-house call between the Citizens House and the ACC (high context Token House Delegates).